In an increasing trend, a totally innocuous incident of rage has led a father to kill his daughter?
But seriously how much of it is actually the truth? It sounds more like the police are framing the father for their incompitence rather than, them finding hardcore evidence to prove the case.
If he actually killed his daughter and the manservent why would he not dispose off the bodies?? being a doctor he'd know the best possible way to do so...unlike the clumsy money-fame- hungry mediocre kannada actress and her outraged naval officer boyfriend.
Lets examine the sequence of events again.... the father found the manservent in an "objectionable but not compromising" position with the daughter and Why did he do it again?according to the police there are two reasons on offer — him being consumed by passion for a woman and enraged by his daughter's opposition, as well as a desire to save the family's "honour" by killing his "loose" daughter —but wait they also mention.... "only further investigations will bring out the truth." so they still dont know what the truth is and they have so confidently pinned down the father..this is what i call abusing position and our right to the freedom of speech!
It took them more than ten yrs to solve hundreds of cases like Jessica lal...the road rage of the spoilt rich son of an MP, the scarlet case which is still "under investigation"...im expecting atleast another three hundred odd days..for them to "investigate" this one and come out with answers.
2 comments:
very inventive fiction...easy to understand and good connection between the sequence of events!!...good job ramya..cheers!!..
300?...dats it?...wen hav u last heard of such a highly publicised case bein solved so quickly??...!!...id say atleast 5 years for a verdict if u go by the normal standards..n another 3 -4 after an appeal to the president or a higher court...
Post a Comment